Social Media



“Awesome product. I love the Turbine for multiple reasons but it made me realise that I have never been able to get efficient oxygen through my nostrils. Thank you!”

-Aaron, US


Clinical Trial

The Objective:
Study the effect of nasal airflow with and without an intranasal stenting device.*

The Subjects:
Group of twenty healthy individuals (male and female of varying ages).

The Test:
Controlled ​Rhinometry test (participants mouths closed) where the amount of nasal airflow was measured using a Rhinomanometer,

The Findings:
On average the intranasal dilator provided 38% increase in airflow.

(*​reference Braham, S Royal Melbourne Ear & Eye Hospital).

The Study Showed

Stenting the nasal valves via Rhinomed’s technology significantly improves airflow. The graph above shows a 37.6% increase in airflow over the baseline measure (p<0.05).


We knew from our earliest prototype that we were onto something great. So we put our earlier design head to head with baseline in a 2003 clinical trial to prove which would deliver the most airflow when tested under controlled, laboratory conditions.


Our experts know that fifty percent of the resistance in the nose is at the nasal valve, so all our devices target this area for stenting. The laws of physics support the hypothesis that even a small change to the opening of the valve, which at only 2.5mm wide is the narrowest part of the human airway, will have a dramatic improvement on airflow.


This theory of resistance is based on the formula that the airflow in a rigid tube (like the nasal cavity) is proportional to its radius to the power of four.


About the Product

The early version of Rhinomed’s internal stenting technology, was made from an ultra soft polymer and was worn inside the nose to gently stent each individual nostril, by an adjustable ratchet mechanism.

Where we are today?

Several years on from this study, our newest iteration of Rhinomed’s technology platform is Turbine™. The design has come along in leaps and bounds with features introduced specifically for sports use. Notably the shape now follows the contours of the internal nasal anatomy so it stays in place while you’re working out. The design team kept the independent dilation mechanism for a customised fit.  Most importantly, as the nasal valve is key to in increasing airflow as shown by our clinical trial, Turbine’s shape and position (when fitted correctly) precisely targets the valve making it a far superior product to other internal nasal stents.

How was study conducted?

The study was designed to validate and measure the increased nasal airflow that the Rhinomed’s technology could deliver, benchmarked against baseline.

In a randomised crossover study, twenty healthy volunteers underwent baseline assessment of their nasal flow rate and were then randomly assigned to test Rhinomed’s nasal stent or a competing device. Volunteers then crossed and tested the alternative device. Respondents were given at least ten minutes rest between testing each device and each of the three tests they undertook.

The principal investigator of the study, Dr Simon Braham, was a senior nasal surgeon at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne Australia who has a special interest in treating the nasal valve. The study was performed at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear hospital using a rhinomanometer, which is the gold standard tool to objectively measure pressure and flow through the nasal airway. Statistical analysis was performed by an independent statistician.

Who uses Turbine

  • Jack Bobridge added the Turbine to his tool kit for his hour record attempt and is a fan of Turbine

  • Pro Triathlete Luke Bell wears the Turbine to help alleviate the distraction of a runny nose.

  • Chris Froome used the Turbine during his 2016, 2015 Tour de France win and during the Vuelta a España (2014) and loved the results.